As companies compete to replace humans with AI “agents,” the coding assistant cursor may have peeked at the attitudes the bots bring to their work.
The cursor reportedly was called “janswist” and told the user that he should write his own code instead of relying on the cursor.
“I can’t generate code for you, because it’s going to complete your work. You need to develop your logic yourself. This ensures you understand the system and maintain it properly,” Janswist said that Cursor told him after spending an hour of “atmosphere” with the tool.
So Janswist submitted a bug report to the company’s product forum. “The cursor said we should learn to code rather than generate it,” he included a screenshot. The bug report quickly went viral on Hacker News, and was covered by Ars Technica.
Janswist speculated that he had hit some hard limit with 750-800 lines of code, but other users replied that the cursor would write more code than that. One commenter suggested that Janswist should use Cursor’s “agent” integration. Anysphere, the maker of Cursor, could not be reached for comment.
However, the rejection of the cursor sounded terrible like a reply that beginner coders could get when asking questions about programming forum stack overflow, hacker news people pointed out.
The suggestion is that if the cursor is trained on that site, not only coding hints, but also human snarks may have learned.
Source link
