The Sales of Apple’s iPhone may be decreasing, but the company’s services, including App Store, iCloud, Music, TV+, and other subscriptions, are still rising.
Cupertino -based, Tech Giant, reported that the service business has increased 14 % year -on -year, the highest in the quarterly of the quarterly history, which ended on Thursday, on December 28. The service has generated nearly $ 100 billion in the past year, and CEO’s Tim Cook stated in a revenue call on Thursday. In addition, Apple reported that it has more than 1 billion subscriptions to the total service, including the App Store third -party app.
The company stated that the customer engagement with services, including both the trading account and the paid account, has reached a record high. Both paid accounts and subscriptions increased by 2 digits year -on -year.
Apple pointed out the extension of specific products such as Apple Arcade. It keeps new programs and Fitness+to add new programs. He also pointed out that Apple taps to pay the iPhone. This is currently living in 20 markets.
Influence of regulations
Regarding subscription topics, investors wanted to know how the new regulatory environment could affect these numbers.
Investors did not ask directly about the Trump administration’s impact on Apple revenue, but one of the questions focused on whether new regulations were beneficial. In other words, will the “more balanced regulatory environment” a potential reverse of the in advance that Apple could be absorbed by the results?
Apple’s CFO Kevan Parekh ranged a question, repeated the number of services positive, and added that customer engagement has been increasing in customer -based, all services, and geographical regions. CEO’s Tim Cook did not answer the question.
For many years, Apple has defended himself in both the United States and overseas over antitrust laws and other governments. The core discussion is concentrated on how much Apple, which is justified from Apps Store from Apple’s hosting apps and acquiring them from the transactions that flow them, are justified.
Last year, when the US Supreme Court ultimately rejected the appeal of the epic, which was submitted by the Fortnite game maker, finally ended an important anti -trial case. In other words, the decision of the lower court that the high -tech giant was not an exclusive person is still standing.
However, the decision means that Apple needs to be able to guide customers to the web from links in the app.
The lawsuit was mainly Apple’s favor, but Epic won the same case on Google. Considering partial victory, other developers may have been inspired by pursuing their own legal measures against Apple or Google, and continuing to be carved in Apple’s chalk hold in the app distribution market. I want.
Source link
