In cybersecurity, confidence is a double-edged sword. Organizations often operate under false security, believing patch vulnerabilities, modern tools, sophisticated dashboards and shining risk scores ensure safety. The reality is a little different. In the real world, checking the right boxes is not safe. As Sun Tzu warned, “Tactics without tactics are the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy are the noise before defeat.” Two and a half years later, the concept is still held. An organization’s cybersecurity defense must be strategically validated under real conditions to ensure the very survival of the business. Today, more than ever, we need hostile exposure verification (AEV), an important strategy that is still missing from most security frameworks.
The danger of false trust
Traditional wisdom suggests that it is “safe” if it patches known bugs, deploys a stack of praised security tools, and passes the required compliance audit. But getting compliance isn’t the same as being actually safe. In fact, these assumptions often create a blind spot and a dangerous sense of false security. The offensive truth is that we catalog only the theoretical problems of CVE scores, EPSS probability, and compliance checklists, not actually verifying actual resilience. The attacker doesn’t care if you are proudly compliant. They care where the cracks in your tissues are, especially those that are often not noticed in daily manipulation.
In many ways, relying on standard controls and annual tests is like standing on a sturdy pier without knowing whether they can withstand that hurricane when they land. . And you know that a storm is coming, you just don’t know if one day your defense is strong enough. Verification of hostile exposure places these assumptions under the microscope. It’s not just a list of potential weaknesses. The AEV pushes mercilessly against these weaknesses until they see which weaknesses are unimportant. At Picus we know that true security requires more verification than faith.
Traditional exposure assessment issues
Why do traditional measures not come to the task of assessing actual cyber exposure? Here are three main reasons:
The vulnerability score tells only half of the story. The important CVSS 9.8 vulnerabilities may seem scary on paper, but if they are not actually exploited in the environment, is fixing it really your number one priority? Gartner’s recent analysis highlights a surprising reality. “In 2023, it was known that only 9.7% of all disclosed vulnerabilities were exploited, about 8-9% each year for the past decade.” In contrast, “moderate” severity flaws can easily be chained in another exploit, and are actually as dangerous as 9.8. The counterintuitive truth is that not all high-score vulnerabilities lead to real risks, and some low-score vulnerabilities can be extremely harmful. It’s clearly overwhelming. Security teams continue to own in the sea of CVEs, risk scores and virtual attack passes. How can your people separate the signal from the noise when everything is flagged as critical? Again, it is important to remember that not all exposures have the same weight. Treating all alerts equally is as bad as ignoring them entirely. In many cases, a real threat is lost in a flood of unrelated data. However, knowing which weaknesses can actually exploit all the changes. You can focus on the real risks hidden in the darkness. The gap between theory and practice. Traditional scans and single quarter penetration tests literally provide snapshots in time. However, in cybersecurity, snapshots age quickly and poorly. Previous quarter reports do not reflect what is happening now. This gap between assessment and reality means that organizations often discover that an organization is not actually safe only after an infringement.
Verifying hostile exposure: the ultimate cybersecurity stress test
Hostile exposure verification (AEV) is a logical evolution of security teams ready to move beyond assumptions and wishful thinking. AEVs act as an ongoing “cybersecurity stress test” for organizations and their defenses. Gartner’s 2024 Hype Cycle for Security Operations incorporates BAS and automated pentest/red teams into a single category of hostile exposure verification, highlighting the power of these previously siloed tools together. Let’s take a closer look:
Violation and Attack Simulation (BAS): Think of BAS as an automated, continuous sparring partner that safely emulates known cyber threats and attacker behavior in your environment. BAS continuously tests that controls detect and prevent malicious actions and provides ongoing evidence as to which attacks are arrested and which attacks slip through. Auto-penetrating test: A systematic probe that not only scans vulnerabilities, but also actively attempts exploitation in stages, as is the case with real attackers. These automated pen tests (sometimes called continuous or autonomous pen tests) launch target attacks, find real weaknesses, check exploits, and investigate system responses.
Importantly, AEVs are not just technology, but also a change in thinking. The major CISOs are currently advocating a “violation” approach. By assuming that the enemy penetrates your first defense, you can focus on verifying its finality preparation. In reality, this means constantly emulating enemy tactics across the complete kill chain, from initial access, lateral movement to data stripping, ensuring people and tools detect each step and ideally stop. This is the goal: a truly aggressive defense.
Gartner predicts that by 2028, continuous exposure verification will be accepted as an alternative to traditional pentest requirements in regulatory frameworks. Foresightful security leaders are already doing this. Why can you strengthen that pier only once a year and hope for the best, continually test and strengthen it to adapt to the ever-evolving tide of threats?
From noise to accuracy: Focus on what’s important
One of the industry’s biggest challenges for security teams is the inability to reduce noise. This is why verifying hostile exposure is so important. It refocuses the team on what is actually important to the organization.
Eliminate speculation by indicating which vulnerabilities can actually be exploited. Instead of sweating dozens of scary cvss 9+ vulns that attackers might exploit, you will know in your environment and in what order you can exploit. This allows you to prioritize defenses based on actual risk rather than hypothetical severity. Streamlined repair. The AEV gives a clear and structured view that exposure, which is truly exploitable in the environment, is truly exploitable, rather than an infinite backlog of “critical” discoveries that never seem to shrink. This means that teams will eventually get out of the response, aggressively fix what really needs to be fixed, dramatically reducing risk, and saving time and effort. Instill confidence (good kind). If AEV tests cannot violate certain controls – if an attack fails to pass the endpoint’s protection, or if the lateral movement is cold halted, you will gain confidence that the defense is holding the line. You can then focus your attention elsewhere. In short, you and your team will gain credibility by doing the right thing without being criticized for correcting what’s wrong.
This transition to verification-centric defense has a concrete return. Gartner projects by 2026 that organizations prioritizing investments based on continuous threat exposure management (including AEVs) will reduce two-thirds of violations. It is a significant reduction in risk and is achieved by zeroing the right problem.
Picus Security: The key forces of hostile exposure verification (AEV)
Picus has been at the forefront of security verification since 2013, pioneering violations and attack simulations, and is now integrated with automated penetration testing to help organizations truly understand the effectiveness of defenses. The PICUS security verification platform gives security teams the clarity they need to take action decisively. There is no more blind spot. There is no further assumption. It’s just a real-world test that ensures you’re ready to respond to today’s threats and tomorrow’s threats.
Ready to move from the illusion of cybersecurity to reality? Download our free Introduction to Exposure Verification eBook to learn more about how AEV converts security programs.
Note: This article has been skillfully written and contributed by Dr. Suleyman Ozarslan, co-founder of Picus and VP of Picus Labs.
Source link
