wHen Voldimir Zelensky arrived at the White House on February 28th. The relationship between the US and Ukraine was fragile and uncertain. By the time the Ukrainian president left, it was crushed. After a full-scale scream in front of television cameras with Donald Trump and his vice president, JD Vance, we vehemently accus the Ukrainian leader of ungrateful and endangering World War III. Hope for peace deals seems farther than ever.
Trump’s claims that relations and Ukraine are not ready for peace increase the risk that his administration will cut off military and financial aid to Ukraine when Russia holds initiatives on the battlefield. It is difficult to think of diplomatic moments that have become so injustice in recent history.
“I don’t have anyone. Trump is working with the United States, sitting in an oval office with Zelensky, Vance and some aides. The US president offered to ask another question, and Vance intervened. He said, “What makes America a good country is that America is engaged in diplomacy. That’s what President Trump is doing.”
At this point, Zelensky may have cajolized and praised Trump, a series of actions favored by other recent visitors to the White House, including France’s Emmanuel Macron and Britain’s Kiel Starmer. Instead, he recited a history of conflict dating back to 2014, pointing out that Vladimir Putin had broken past deals. “What kind of diplomacy, JD, are you talking?” Zelensky asked in incomplete but clearly 3rdnic English. This went straight into the hands of Mr Vance, who was undoubtedly intended to attack and humiliate Mr Zelensky.
Zelensky went to Washington on two major tasks. It is to protect Ukrainian war efforts with a continuous stream of arms and lay the foundation for a continuing peace agreement. Ukraine correctly believes that a ceasefire without security guarantees, supported by a trustworthy West, is a trap that allows Russia to run around and destabilise Ukraine internally. “We will never accept a ceasefire alone,” Zelensky said. But it was the wrong time to have a discussion with American leaders.
“I think it’s rude to come to an oval office and try and sue this in front of the American media right now,” the Vice President shot back. He then attacked Ukraine, attacking to “force drafting to the frontline,” and when asked by Zelensky whether he had visited Ukraine, he rejected the visit to the country as a “propaganda tour” by other international leaders.[s]”.
When I entered the meeting, I was hoping that the chilly relationship between the two leaders would have been thawed somewhat. At a press conference with Ir Keel Starmer a day ago, Trump denied calling Zelensky a dictator. On the contrary, the Ukrainian leader was “very brave” and he was “very brave.” There were deals that were mostly signed for the exploitation of joint minerals. Before the consultations began, European officials in Kiev dared to wish, “We want them to leave a smile.”
During the Vance-Zelensky Scuffle, Trump initially seemed almost passive, a good cop to Vance’s bad cop. Zelensky then went too far. “Everyone has problems during the war,” he insisted. The “nice sea” has now been insulated in America.
Trump clearly didn’t like it. “You shouldn’t tell us what we’re feeling,” he narrated, and he narrated as the summit meeting turned into a catastrophe. He then added that Ukraine is in a bad place and is “gambling with World War III.” He warned, “What you’re doing is very rude to this country.” Vance reminded the president that Zelensky appeared with a Democrat in Pennsylvania during the campaign last year, and told visitors to show more gratitude to his benefactors. Trump’s anger has deepened.
It wasn’t long before Trump stumbled upon Hunter Biden, the son of the former president, and pointed out that Barack Obama offered javelins to Ukraine when he refused to provide fatal aid. The president lamented, “It will be extremely difficult to do business like this,” and continued to downplay Zelensky and his country.
French President Macron visited Washington on February 24th. Ir Kiel did that on the 27th. Both trips were considered successful in Europe. Each leader was forced to Trump on security assurance issues, and both meetings ended on cheerful terms. However, the February 28 explosion has already sparked a deep warning in the European capital. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tass immediately issued a message of solidarity with Ukraine. [Zelensky]Ukrainian friends, you are not alone.” Almost every important European leader followed.
European leaders are scheduled to take place in London on March 2nd and will adjust their positions on potential military deployments to Ukraine after the ceasefire and how to pay for higher defence spending. However, there is no doubt that America is at the heart of Ukraine’s war effort. Europe offers 60% assistance to 40% of the US in a single estimate, but Ukraine relies not only on American air defense interceptors, but also on American weapon information and spare parts flows.
Meanwhile, in Moscow there was a joy that was not alloyed. “The abolished pig has finally received a proper slap in its oval office,” said Dmitry Medvedev, vice-chairman of the Russian Security Council. “The Kiev administration is “World War II and Gambling.” ”
“It’s amazing how it comes through emotions,” Trump posted on social media shortly after the fight. He added that Zelensky “is not ready for peace,” and disrespected the Ukrainians by disrespecting America. “He can come back when he is ready for peace,” the scheduled press conference was cancelled, and Zelensky left the White House early, without signing a mineral right contract that initially took him to Washington.
The road beyond Ukraine is now unknown, but it is at risk. Internal and external actors could increase pressure on Zelensky’s resignation, elections, or both. However, it is not clear that this will occur without the cancellation of martial law during wartime and plunge into chaos. “To enter into dialogue with Trump like this doesn’t leave him a chance,” says a Ukrainian opposition lawmaker. “He’s going to have to destroy Zelensky now. I’m worried that prices will become our entire country.”
Even Zelensky’s inner agent agreed that it was a disaster. The president was tired and deduced that after the war three years later, there was a long transatlantic flight. He was being provoked by a manufactured battle. “JD was the problem,” one of them said. “Zelensky had to show the credible power of negotiations, but there was too much emotion,” a senior Ukrainian security source said Vance seemed happy that the negotiations never happened. “As a tow truck, Vance was well prepared,” he says. “He did his thing professionally.”
At the end of the screaming, Trump said, “This is going to be a great TV.” The Ukrainian president scots as he sat with his hands clasped. Mr. Vance smirked. His work was done. ■
Source link
