Madison (AP), Wisconsin -conservative judge, Wisconsin’s Supreme Court, said on Thursday that he would not participate in a pending case that determines whether he will regain the right to collective negotiations by the 2011 law.
Judge Brian Hegohn broke up a law known as the Law 10 when he was the highest lawyer of the GOV at the time. Scottwalker. His decision to refuse himself from the incident has four liberal justice and two conservatives in the court.
Congress managed by the Republican Party Early this week Before she joined the court, she signed a petition that reminds me of a walker during the battle over the law before calling the law to unconstitutional, and protested in 2011 and marched to the National Council. Protas Evitch asked not to hear the case.
Hagedorn said in a short two -page instruction that the law ordered him not to hear the case. The Democratic Party on Tuesday called him to be aside.
“The proposal issues include the issues that I provided legal advisors in both the first craft and subsequent defense, including the case where almost the same claims were raised under the Federal Constitution,” said Hagedorn. I am writing.
Protasiewicz does not respond to the call she is aside. Even if she did so, the court would still have a majority of 3-2 liberal.
She did not participate in the gradual ruling on Thursday related to the incident.
Last month, Judge Dane County Judge I overturned the bulk The law states that it violates equal protection guarantees in the Wisconsin Constitution by splitting public servants into “general” and “public security” employees. Under the ruling, all the workers in the public sector who have lost their collective bargaining have been restored to what had been implemented before 2011.
The judge waited for the appeal and made a decision. The lawsuit, which filed a lawsuit, asked the Supreme Court to take it directly and skipped the appeal court. Wisconsin’s Supreme Court has not yet decided to file a lawsuit.
Currently, Hagedorn does not participate in other decisions related to the decision or lawsuit.
Law supporters stated that local governments provided more and more controls to reduce workers and costs. By abolishing the law, schools and local governments have allowed them to collect funds for benefits through higher employees.
The opposition of the Democratic Party claims that the law is damaging schools and other government agencies by taking the ability of employees. Dig up in a group For their salary and working conditions.
Source link
