The Syrian national dialogue, a key moment in the country’s political transition after the fall of President Bashar al-Assad in December, ended on Tuesday.
The statement made at the end of the day’s meeting was released on Sunday, giving many potential participants little time to prepare, and a new constitution was drafted, allowing freedom of expression and the importance of humanity. It emphasized sexuality. right.
Among the attendees was Syrian President Ahmed Arshara. He previously called the Syrians “After decades of dictatorship, unite and hold hands to heal the wounds and wash away the pain.”
Below are three important points from the meeting:
What will happen to Syria’s new constitution?
The nature of the Syrian revolution – a utter rejection of decades of control of the Al-Assad family and the Baath party means that a new constitution was expected.
The nature of its constitution reveals much about Syria’s future, especially as questions remain among many people surrounding Al-Sharara’s intentions, particularly in light of its previous affiliation with Al-Qaeda.
Alshara has quickly distanced himself from his past and has largely avoided divisive rhetoric.
In the dialogue, representatives were divided into working groups, each focusing on different topics, such as constitutional law, freedom, economy, and civil society.
Hoodha Itasi, a member of the National Dialogue Preparation Committee, who read the statement at the end of the meeting, said that the committee was “temporary constitutional declaration” and “temporary legislative council” to help the committee decide the future of the country. He said he asked for it.
The draft constitution must achieve “establishing balance, justice, freedom, equality, and building the foundations of laws and institutions,” the full statement said.
However, no other details were provided, and the discussions at the workshop are confidential and leaving the question of how the Constitution takes stance, the number of previously declared March 1 deadlines A few days ago, a new transitional government came to power.
Sovereignty and Israel’s actions
The final statement strongly rejects Israel’s actions in Syria since the overthrow of al-Assad, calling them a “blatant violation of the sovereignty of the Syrian state.”
Israel moved its troops to a buffer zone between Syria and Golan Heights. It is itself a territory of Syria illegally occupied by Israel. Israel also controlled areas outside the buffer zone, including Mount Harmon, and carried out repeated bombing raids at military sites, including Tuesday’s overnight attacks.
The national dialogue called for the “immediate and unconditional withdrawal” of Israeli forces from Syria.
The threat of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected the threat that his country would not have Syrian troops in southern Syria.
The conference also opposed Israel’s attempts to blow away sectarian tensions by showing its willingness to protect Syrian minority communities.
The committee called for “uniformity of the Syrian Arab Republic” and “sovereignty over the entire territory,” and rejected fragmentation, division or concession in all forms of his homeland.”
The new Syrian government has been debated with the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), a Kurdish-led group that controls most of northeastern Syria.
The US-backed SDF is hesitant to abandon its arms and expresses its desire for autonomous rules in areas that the Syrian government rejects.
Rights and freedom
The final statement also called for “supporting the role of women in all fields” and “rejecting any form of discrimination based on race, religion or sect.”
It also rejected the government’s call for ethnic or religious assignments. They refused to show that Arshala and the other ministers had previously expressed their opposition.
The location of women in the new government was unclear after a statement from a specific minister. For example, Aisha Al Dibs, director of the Syrian Career Government’s Women’s Affairs, said in December that women will play an important role but “do not exceed the priorities of God-given nature.” . You will know “their educational role in the family.”
Syrian Foreign Minister Assad al-Shaibani was immediately opposed to these statements at the time, saying the new authorities “believe in the active role of women within society.”
The final statement of the dialogue called for the protection of freedom, including freedom of opinion and expression. This marks a major difference from the previous regime, where Syrians were regularly incarcerated for their speeches.
Another issue of rights mentioned in the final statement is to achieve transitional justice and hold “rejecting any form of violence, incitement, or revenge” while holding “the person responsible for crime” accountable. It was. Reports have emerged in recent weeks of revenge attacks on people related to the Al-Assad regime in the country.
Did the national dialogue come together too quickly?
The confusion surrounded the national dialogue before it began, and many last minute invitations were sent.
Opposition politician George Sabra posted on social media that he received an invitation to be present in Damascus on February 23rd, two days before the event. Sabla lives in exile in France and he says he cannot travel to Syria in time.
Critics worry that the Syrians will push for democratic pluralism, the nature of public dialogue announcements offers little about election timelines and how free new Syria will be. They say it’s part of a wider pattern.
Consultations were questioned as critics labelled the lack of representation on the preparatory committee.
But even the sudden announcement of the date of the national dialogue, around 600 Syrians attended the consultation, many said that it had not been released from decades of dictatorship and on the way to the new Syria I believe it is an important step.
Source link
