At times this week at the World Economic Forum, Davos appeared to be turning into a powerhouse technology conference, with Tesla CEO Elon Musk, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and more industry executives taking to the stage.
Unsurprisingly, the biggest topic was AI, with CEOs laying out their vision for the technology’s transformative potential, while also acknowledging continued concerns that AI is inflating a giant bubble. Amid these big predictions, they sometimes found time to attack competitors and even their ostensible partners.
On the latest episode of TechCrunch’s Equity podcast, I chatted with TechCrunch’s Kirsten Korosec and Sean O’Kane about all things Davos.
Kirsten noted that the conference looked different than in years past, with technology companies like Meta and Salesforce taking over the main promenades, while important topics like climate change didn’t draw crowds. And Sean said it can feel that way even if AI executives aren’t doing a good job of “responsive to usage and more customers.”
Read a preview of the full conversation below, edited for length and clarity.
Kirsten: For example, some of the discussions around climate change and poverty and big global issues. [are] It doesn’t really attract a crowd. Meanwhile, on the main promenade in Davos, Switzerland, some of the largest stores are being renovated and taken over by companies such as Meta, Salesforce, Tata and many Middle Eastern countries. And I think the biggest one was USA House, which was sponsored by McKinsey and Microsoft. It really felt visually different.
And Elon Musk was there too — Sean, you and I both heard that. There wasn’t much there, but he’s avoided Davos in the past, so it was interesting to see him show up.
tech crunch event
san francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026
Anthony: We were trying to pull out the technology content from Davos. [and] There’s absolutely something worth highlighting here, but it’s also striking that, especially with AI becoming such a big business story, it’s difficult to completely separate it from all the other threads going on about larger issues around international trade and world politics.
One of the big headlines that comes up is; [Davos]At least for us, it was a statement from the Anthropic CEO, and he was basically attacking the Trump administration’s decision to allow NVIDIA to send chips to China. This is a technology story, a trade story, and a politics story.
As far as the content of what he says, I think it struck me as consistent in the sense that he generally lets it go, and also in the sense that this is an interesting line. [in AI discourse] There’s an element of criticism there, but it also ties into this really intense AI hype. One of the phrases he used was that an AI data center is like a country full of geniuses. I have doubts about that, but he said: “How can we send all these chips to China if we’re worried about China? Because essentially we’re sending a country full of geniuses to China and letting China control it.”
Sean: You could write down all the different weird phrases that CEOs are using this week in a notebook. Another thing that sticks in my mind is that Satya Nadella kept referring to data centers as token factories. This is a nice abstraction of what he thinks data centers are for.
You know, there were two things that really stood out to me about the different things that these CEOs said at different times during the week. One is that it’s not just Anthropic and Nvidia, they’re definitely attacking each other in all kinds of ways. Anthropic is a big Nvidia customer and uses Nvidia GPUs, so that’s interesting, so there’s an interesting tension there. But just to see them sitting next to each other and pulling it out a little bit more than we’re used to seeing them with their knives out.
We know they’re all striving to take center stage, and we know they’re all trying to retain their talent without wasting it to death. And this was one of the first times that the tension was palpable and it really felt like they were there. These two things are not often true at the same time.
The other thing is, of all the points you make about geopolitics and the business of it, I feel like this one is the most blatant and puts on record what CEOs think they need to continue to be successful.
Satya Nadella — I think maybe there’s a negative view, but I don’t think it’s that bad — was more or less like, “More people need to use this, or the bubble is going to burst.” He took a very different position in some ways than Anthropic’s Dario Amadei. Because Nadella’s focus is really on trying to scoop up as many uses as possible. [and] How can we make AI available equitably across different communities and around the world, rather than being concentrated in one place, such as only in wealthy places? I thought this was an interesting tension. But there’s an element of him giving up on the game rather than really begging for usage or more customers…but kind of.
And at that point, Nvidia’s Jensen Huang did something similar and more or less said, “We haven’t invested enough in this, and we need more investment to make this work.”
Kirsten: Jensen’s comment was interesting. Because he was actually talking about it in terms of job creation. You could also argue that there will come a point when job growth slows down, but no one is seriously talking about that right now.
I think the other thing was a good point you made. That said, we never really saw them huddled in a room sniping at each other. A lot of times conferences and Satya have people like Sam Altman. [Nadella]but here they are all together. That means you’re listening in real time.
Source link
