NEW YORK (AP) – A federal judge said Trump administration’s deportation efforts Mahmoud Khalil His pro-Palestinian activities at Columbia University are likely to violate the Constitution.
In a long order issued Wednesday, Judge Michael Farbeers wrote the main justification of the government to eliminate Halil – his belief is It could pose a threat US foreign policy can open the door to ambiguous and arbitrary enforcement.
Still, Fabiartz stopped the order of Halil, who was released from Louisiana prison, and his lawyers were not fully responding to the other charges brought by the government.
The judge said he will consider additional evidence in the coming days as he continues to consider Khalil’s request for release.
That’s what Halil, a legal US resident Detained by a federal immigration agent President Donald Trump’s first arrest under increased crackdown on students who participated in campus protests on March 8 in the lobby of his university-owned apartment Israel’s war in Gaza.
He has been in custody for nearly 12 weeks at the Immigration Detention Center in Jena, Louisiana, and missed the birth of his first child. Recent graduation From Columbia University.
Halil’s lawyers argue that his detention is part of a wider attempt by the Trump administration to curb constitutionally protected freedom of speech.
In a letter sent from the prison, Halil described the arrest as “a direct result of my exercise of my right to free speech, as I defended free Palestine and the end of Gaza’s genocide.”
The federal government has not accused Halil of breaking the law. Instead, they have I submitted a note Secretary of State Marco Rubio has signed to argue that the presence of Halil at home could pose a threat to the interests of US foreign policy.
The government provided the same legitimacy as detaining other pro-Palestinian activists, including another Colombian student. Mohsen Mahadawi;Tufts University students; Rumeysa Ozturk;Scholar at Georgetown University; Badar Khan Suri. All three have gained custody in recent weeks as they continue to fight lawsuits.
In the case of Khalil, the government also said it withheld information from his residency application about its involvement in some organizations, including UN agencies that resettle Palestinian refugees and Colombian protest groups.
A judge on Wednesday said that although Khalil’s attorneys had not responded appropriately to the claims, they were allowed to address the issue in the future.
Baher Azmy, Khalil’s lawyer, said the charges were “effectively unfounded and an excuse punishment for his first speech to amend the constitution.”
Source link
