The main authority of the U.S. Supreme Court has issued an unusual statement rebuking President Donald Trump for a federal judge’s ammo.
On Tuesday, Secretary John Roberts released two short lines, neither of which mentions Trump by name.
But his message was clear. It is unacceptable to threaten federal judges with bullet each.
“For over two centuries, it has been established that each is not an appropriate response to discrepancies in judicial decisions.
Roberts’ remarks arrived within hours of Trump’s own social media mischief, who blew up Justice James E. Boasberg, who works for U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.
“The troublemaker and agitator madman, sadly appointed by this radically evicted judge, Barack Hussein Obama, was not elected president,” Trump wrote in a lengthy post claiming that the presidential authorities had disguised as judiciary. “He didn’t win the popularity vote.”
Boasberg recently ordered the Trump administration to halt deportation carried out under the Alien Enemy Act of 1798.
The law was used only three times before the war, but the last example was the forced imprisonment of Japanese Americans and foreigners during World War II.
However, some speculated that the Trump administration proceeded with deportation based on the act on Saturday evening, and that it openly violated Boasburg’s orders.
Boasberg himself has not yet ruled whether the Trump administration violated a court order. However, he is asking U.S. Department of Justice attorneys to deliver when the deportation flight took off and other information about the events that took place on Saturday night.
But Trump called for Boasberg, who was appointed to various positions in the judicial system by Republican and Democrat presidents, to be removed from his post.
“This judge should be bounced each, like many of the bent judges, forced me to appear before!!!” Trump wrote Tuesday morning.
Congress actually has the power to fire each federal judge, but such cases are rare.
The last federal judge to be fired was G. Thomas Porteus, who served in the Eastern District of Louisiana. He was accused of accepting bribery and publishing false statements, and took office in 2010.
But this is not the first time Trump has posed such a threat. For example, in November 2023, Trump sought a bluff for both the judge and prosecutor in the case, as he faced a civil investigation into alleged fraud in the Trump organization.
“judge [Arthur] “Engoron and Letitia James should be fired and appointed multiple times to injure me and to mislead my property value,” he wrote.
However, since taking office in his second term on January 20th, Trump has faced many legal challenges for many of his controversial policy changes.
Republicans lined up behind him, reverberating his criticism of various judges as biased and corrupt.
Boasberg’s order on Saturday spurred a new wave of such rhetoric, with several right-wing lawmakers calling for his removal.
“Another day, another judge will decide on the policy this time to benefit foreign gang members.”
Meanwhile, President Brandon Gill said he submitted a story about the perpetrator to the House of Representatives against “radical activist” Boasberg.
“He has committed a high crime and misdemeanor crime and should be excluded from office,” Gill posted on social media on Tuesday.
Even Elon Musk, a donor to Trump’s reelection campaign and White House adviser, weighed it on Monday.
“The very worst judges — those who repeatedly disregard the law — should at least put them on a perpetrator vote, whether or not the vote was successful,” Musk said on his social media platform X.
However, Supreme Court Justice Roberts has long defended the court system against such pressure.
Last year, in his year-end report, Roberts similarly condemned lawmakers’ attempts to promote each ammo on political grounds.
“Civil servants, unfortunately, have also engaged in recent attempts to blackmail judges, suggesting, for example, political bias in judges’ unfavourable rulings without credible basis for such allegations,” writes Roberts.
“In the past year, we have also seen that state and federal bar associations need to come to the defense of federal district judges.
Similarly, the American Bar Association is paying attention to this trend as Trump’s second term unfolds.
“There was a call for “corrupted judges” to be fired up each without any effort to produce evidence of what is called “corruption,” the association wrote in a statement on March 3rd.
“These are only directed at judges who oppose the government’s position.”
Source link
