When President Washington -Donald Trump made Linda McMahon the next secretary of the US Ministry of Education, he said he had “deep understanding” both education and business.
However, like Trump’s previous educational secretary Betsy Devos, McMahon has a relatively limited experience in the American school system. She doesn’t work full-time at schools or universities in K-12. She spent most of her career as an executive at the wrestling entertainment company.
She is a short stint at the State Board of Education in Connecticut, and is a long -standing member of the Caucalid Heart University Council, a private university in Connecticut. She originally planned to be a teacher, but more than 10 years ago, she changed her heart after she met her husband at college, according to her remark. She has also led an important federal agency. She was the head of small and medium -sized business management during the first term of Trump.
McMahon will probably acquire the top employment setting for national schools, as Republican members in charge of confirming the appointment of the Presidential ministers are dominating the US Senate.
What will happen after that is an unresolved question, especially in consideration of repeatedly shutting down the departments appointed to McMahon to supervise. If he commits that path, he may face a political battle with discussions in a parliament that has the power to abolish federal agencies. South Dakota Republican Senator has introduced a bill this month to shuffle various offices in the education department to other corners of federal bureaucrats.
In a statement after being tapped on the post of the educational secretary, McMahon has been present for decades, but during Trump’s 2024 President, these ideas that have become more mainstream among Republicans. I didn’t deal with it. Her comment gave thanks to Trump to her nomination, but did not lay out a larger vision for Agency.
“I am deeply honored at this opportunity, humble, and commit to work vigorously so that all students can access high -quality education,” she said.
Despite her limited experiences in the educational environment, Macmahon’s records and past statements provide insights on where she can withstand important problems.
Read more: From stacking to hairstyle, Trump’s educational secretary WWE cameo will be viral.
Trump: McMahon reduces school monitoring
For the past few years, McMahon is the chairman of the American First Policy Research Institute, a chunk tank located in Trump, based in Washington DC, and its organization has CRL of school federal monitoring. He says that he is focusing on that. Significantly reduce the funding of federal education.
When Trump announced McMahon as his choice led by the education department on November 19, he stated in a statement that she would make an effort to “send education to the state”.
According to websites in the education department, K-12 school education has already been supervised in the US and local levels. “Education is mainly responsible for the state and regions of the United States. It is not only all kinds of public and private organizations that establish schools and universities, develop a curriculum, and determine the requirements for registration and graduation. And a community.
Many public schools receive the federal government’s funding, which accounts for a small, but important budget. Most universities also receive the federal government funds. This supports research and financial assistance for low -income students. If the institution accepts the money assigned by Congress, they are obliged to follow the Federal Law and regulations. These laws do a lot, such as discrimination and looting marketing.
Read more: A new era of university monitoring is underway at Washington’s Republican ECTA.
School choices, parent rights
Trump called McMahon a “intense advocate” of his parents’ rights, and said he would work hard as the Chief of Education to expand the universal school choice. 。
These ideas are important policy goals of the think tank MCMAHON. According to the website, the American First Policy Research Institute uses more taxes to provide funds to private education and have expanded their parents’ impact on what children learned in the classroom. Masu. GOP formally formulated the universal school selection approval during the Republican National Convention this summer.
The critic of school selection movements says that public schools route very much money and help unreasonably enriched families. Supporters say that parents give parents more options for child education by making private school alternatives more affordable.
Republican members won the whole country in the November election, but were refused the selection of famous schools in Colorado and Kentucky. Nebraska voters have also refused the school voucher scholarship program.
Devos, a friend of McMAhon and a keen support for school choices, has expressed his support for MCMAHON in a social media post on November 21.
“I know she is ready to go to work to expand her education,” said Devos.
Becky Pringle, the chairman of the National Education Association, the largest teacher union in Japan, called McMahon a “qualified” candidate, and compared her to “Betzy Devos 2.0.”
“During his first term, Donald Trump has appointed Betzy Devos, has been appointed to weaken public schools through the voucher and eventually privatize,” she said. “Now, Linda McMahon has returned to it.”
Read more: Trump’s candidate for Trump said she was acquired her education. She does not.
Support for university alternatives
McMahon graduated in 1969 at the University of East Carolina in French and graduated. However, she indicates that the bachelor’s degree does not think it is for everyone. And support for universities alternatives is an increasingly favorable policy position by Republican and Democrats.
In recent weeks, she has proposed an apprentice and has issued an official statement that has praised the Swiss approach to vocational training.
In September, she wrote an article that supported the parliamentary labor -powered law, which is a parliamentary bill that expands Per subsidies into education training programs in fields such as beauty, nursing, and construction. Pell Grants is a free scholarship given to low -income students from the federal government to support the university payment. The maximum percentage of last grades was $ 7,395.
“By increasing the qualifications including high quality short -term labor training programs, this law will help more Americans access the necessary education in today’s economy,” McMahon. Is writing.
Opponents of the law have stated that a short program of 15 weeks is already subject to federal funding. They say that the bills can ultimately give taxpayers’ money to the students who use it because the appropriate guardrails are not in place. In the blog post in April, Rachelfishman, the director of the high -education program in New America, a left -handed think tank, criticized the types of programs designed to support legislation.
She writes, “These very short programs.” “I’m going to the opportunity, leading to a further racial layer of unemployment, poverty wages, and higher education systems.”
Zachary Schermele is an educational reporter for USA toDay. You can contact him zschermele@usatoday.com by email. Follow him with X of @zachschermele.
Source link
