Washington (AP) – For parents of children with disabilities, Advocate for their children It can be complicated, time-consuming and expensive.
Changes in the education sector are likely to make the process even more challenging, advocates for children with disabilities say.
When parents believe that their children are not receiving appropriate services or school accommodation Because of a disabilitythey can seek relief from their district. They can file a complaint with the state, claiming that the child’s rights were taken away without a legitimate process of law, or they may argue that they are pursuing a lawsuit in state or federal courts.
These processes often involve multiple sessions with hearing officers who do not need to be experts in disability law. Legal costs can cost tens of thousands of dollars in a single case. Legal aid and other advocacy groups that can provide free support are often in demand for more services than they can meet.
But filing a complaint with the education department has long been an option for families who can’t afford a lawyer. They start by filling out Civil Rights Bureau Online forms, document cases of suspected discrimination. From there, institutional staff are to investigate complaints, often interviewing school district employees and investigating district policies for wider violations.
“It’s known and has the weight of the federal government behind it,” said Dan Stewart, who manages education and employment attorneys at the National Disability Rights Network. “The process, complaints portal, and processing manual are all published and do not require or are normally not involved.”
The option appears to be increasingly out of reach, supporters say.
Under President Donald Trump, Educational staff It’s been cut in about half – its attorneys, including the Civil Rights Office, are accused of investigating complaints of discrimination against children with disabilities. Staff are instructed Prefers anti-Semitism cases. The pending cases, including people associated with children with disabilities, have historically been the largest share of office jobs, primarily lazy weeks after Trump took office. The freeze on handling cases was lifted earlier this month, but supporters are questioning whether the department can make progress with fewer staff members.
“The power cut is simply the secrets of the Civil Rights Investigation Bureau’s investigative agency and responsibility,” Stewart said. “There’s no way for OCR to see that it can keep up with the backlog or the coming complaints.”
A federal lawsuit filed Friday challenged layoffs at the Civil Rights Office, claiming it destroyed its ability to deal with and investigate complaints.
The OCR process wasn’t perfect, but reducing the number of investigative staff in the office only exacerbates the challenges families face when seeking child support, said Nikki Carter, advocate for children with disabilities and one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
“They feel hopeless and helpless,” Carter said. “By posting regulations in a particular case, we just feel that we’re being strengthened by reducing the number of employees to handle cases.”
Education officials argue that staff cuts have no impact on civil rights investigations and that layoffs are “strategic decisions.”
In her Alabama, Carter said her family faces a difficult fight to find legal representatives.
“They don’t have the money for lawyers,” she said. “Or the expression they’re getting is not what they think is best for their kids.”
Even if a family can afford to pay high costs, a limited number of lawyers have the expertise to undertake discrimination cases for people with disabilities. Programs that offer free expressions are often limited in capacity.
If the federal Civil Rights Office has a rise in litigation backlogs, families could lose faith in how quickly their complaints are investigated, Stewart said. It could drive them into alternative pathways, such as filing state complaints.
But state and local agencies don’t always have the ability or understanding to handle complaints about educational disability, Stewart said.
“They may not have the infrastructure, knowledge, staffing to take on the influx of cases,” Stewart said.
Another thing Federal lawsuits The Democratic attorney general, filed Thursday, argued that cutting staff in the education sector could involve school districts in order to ignore complaints of discrimination and harassment.
“Students with current complaints may not have a meaningful solution as it is repeated due to a lack of employees to resolve employees,” the lawsuit said. “Students facing discrimination, sexual harassment, or sexual assault will lose a significant path to reporting their lawsuit.”
____
Associated Press Education Compensation receives financial support from several private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find the AP standard For charity, list of ap.org supporters and funded compensation areas.
Source link
