The populist New Zealand first party says it will ensure Bill will move the country away from “awakening ideology” that hurts women.
The Minor Party of New Zealand’s Union Government has announced a proposal to legally define women by biological gender and cast the move as a return to common sense and a rejection of “awakening ideology.”
The bill, released by the Populist New Zealand First (NZF) Party on Tuesday, defines “human biological women” and “adult human biological men” and women in duty, respectively.
NZF leader Winston Peters said the party governs a coalition of the central right-wing Nationalist Party and New Zealand’s professional business law, and the proposed law “reflects biological reality and provides legal certainty.”
“This bill ensures that our country is away from the awakened ideology that has crept into over the past few years, and undermines the protection, progress and safety of women.”
“These definitions of law fight back against cancerous social engineering, which we have seen as being forced onto society by awakened minorities,” Peters added.
“The need for such laws shows how much the misled left has taken us as a society. But we are fighting back. This bill is a victory for common sense.”
It is not clear whether the bill introduced by individual MPs on behalf of the government has a realistic prospect that it will become law.
The NZF is the smallest of the three government coalition partners, with 123 parliaments with 11 seats, and most bills introduced by individual lawmakers are ultimately not listed in the statute book.
Chris Hipkins, the leader of the main opposition New Zealand Labour Party, accused the NZF of being interested in “the next one headline.”
“They don’t have a really consistent program. They certainly don’t focus on what they need to move New Zealand forward,” Hipkins told Radio New Zealand.
The proposal comes less than a week after the UK Supreme Court ruled that women are defined by biological sex under the national equality law.
The landmark decision was welcomed by conservative politicians and some feminist advocacy groups, but was greeted with disappointment by transgender and progressive activists.
Source link
