The courts filed in multi-billion dollar university sports lawsuits; List – Proposed relief measures for limit rules Maintaining this case is not enough to protect other athletes who lost their spot when the school began to cut down on athletes in anticipation of approval.
Lawyers for Michigan walk-on footballer John Wydenbach and Yale Lower Grace Menke responded to a suggestion last week that athletes who lost their spot due to roster restrictions rules won’t count towards the cap when they appear next year.
This is the roster cap that prevented US District Judge Claudia Wilken from approving the $2.788 billion settlement.
Wilken suggested that athletes already on the roster are “great grandfathers.” For the rest of their college careers, not to resort to new roster restrictions. The restrictions are expected to sacrifice spots on the roster with thousands of athletes (mostly walk-on or partial scholarships), while expanding scholarship opportunities in all sports.
Wilken accepts the submissions of opponents by Tuesday, and has since given to the NCAA and plaintiffs until Friday to rebut those arguments.
The court filed by the court on behalf of Menke and Weidenbach argues that the solutions proposed by the NCAA and plaintiffs “fail in many ways” to protect those athletes.
Among the discussion is that the proposed remedy makes the spot of an entirely optional option for schools that cut players by restoring players. They also say that the commands to create a list of players that the school cut due to roster restrictions (the list is used to determine which players should not count against the new cap) leave room for other reasons for teams to cut players.
“We don’t offer student-athletes the opportunity to challenge these decisions or prove that the cap on the roster, not something else, cut them,” Filing said.
The NCAA and plaintiffs argue that none of these roster spots were guaranteed, and that the provision that allows players to compete for their spots back to the old team doesn’t leave them in a worse situation than before they were cut.
However, the filing argues that damage has already been caused by schools that cut players with the hopes that Wilken will approve the settlement.
“Attorneys continue to hear from many athletes and their families whose lives are upside down as a result of the implementation of caps on the roster,” Filing said. “The defendant’s indifference is surprising when a simple fix is provided to address the issues of their production.”
Among the proposed amendments of opponents was that the school automatically restores players to the old roster, while also giving them “discretion to reduce athletes on legitimate reasons unrelated to the cap on the roster, such as command violations, movement violations and academic achievement.”
Under the latest proposal, players will be able to return to old schools or find a new school, but in any case, they will not resort to restrictions on the school’s roster.
___
AP College Sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports
Source link
