Close Menu
  • Home
  • Identity
  • Inventions
  • Future
  • Science
  • Startups
  • Spanish
What's Hot

Delve accused of misleading customers with ‘false compliance’

Why Wall Street wasn’t attracted to NVIDIA’s big conference

The mechanism of nuclear fusion power generation and startups pursuing it

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • User-Submitted Posts
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Fyself News
  • Home
  • Identity
  • Inventions
  • Future
  • Science
  • Startups
  • Spanish
Fyself News
Home » Elon Musk misled Twitter investors to avoid acquisition, jury says
Startups

Elon Musk misled Twitter investors to avoid acquisition, jury says

By March 20, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

A California civil jury on Friday ruled that Elon Musk intentionally misled Twitter investors when he tried to back out of his $44 billion acquisition of the platform in 2022.

At the time, Musk tweeted that there were too many bots on Twitter, which was why he later tried to fight back against the acquisition. (Twitter ultimately filed suit to force Musk to sign the deal.)

“Twitter transactions are temporarily on hold pending further details supporting calculations that spam/fake accounts actually account for less than 5% of users,” Musk wrote on the platform, which has since been renamed X.

Twitter trading temporarily on hold pending details supporting calculation that spam/fake accounts actually account for less than 5% of users https://t.co/Y2t0QMuuyn

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 13, 2022

In the days after Musk posted this, Twitter stock fell 8%. Investor Giuseppe Pampena filed the lawsuit against Musk on behalf of other former Twitter investors who sold their Twitter shares between May 13 (the date of the tweet) and October 4, when the transaction was completed.

Mr. Pampena’s lawsuit alleges that Mr. Musk intentionally posted his concerns on Twitter in order to create uncertainty about the stability of the platform, artificially depressing the stock price and causing losses to those who sold their shares during the period. Musk’s lawyers argued that he had legitimate concerns about the number of bots on the app. However, the jury was convinced by the plaintiff’s argument.

It’s not yet clear how much Musk will have to pay former Twitter shareholders, but Pampena’s lawyer said damages could reach up to $2.6 billion, according to CNBC. This isn’t a huge blow to Musk, as Bloomberg estimates his net worth at more than $660 billion.

This is not the first time Musk has been sued over tweets. In 2018, he tweeted that he had secured funding to take Tesla private at $420 per share. This means a plan to buy out ordinary shareholders and delist the company from the stock exchange. The SEC claimed the posts were misleading and charged Musk with securities fraud. Musk later testified in court that he was not making a marijuana joke (420 is a widely known term for cannabis) and that he truly believed he would take Tesla private for $420 per share, a significant premium to Tesla’s stock price at the time.

tech crunch event

San Francisco, California
|
October 13-15, 2026

Musk won a similar lawsuit brought by shareholders over his “funding” tweet, but now he must pay compensation.

After acquiring Twitter, Musk rebranded the company as X and later merged it with his new AI company, xAI. Musk said the combined company would be valued at $113 billion. And last month, SpaceX merged with xAI. Musk said the merger was motivated by a desire to build data centers in space.


Source link

#Aceleradoras #CapitalRiesgo #EcosistemaStartup #Emprendimiento #InnovaciónEmpresarial #Startups
Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
Previous ArticleMicrosoft rolls back some of its Copilot AI bloat on Windows
Next Article A week after President Trump announced the end of the relationship, the Pentagon told Anthropic that the two sides were largely in agreement, a new court filing reveals.

Related Posts

Delve accused of misleading customers with ‘false compliance’

March 21, 2026

Why Wall Street wasn’t attracted to NVIDIA’s big conference

March 21, 2026

The mechanism of nuclear fusion power generation and startups pursuing it

March 21, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest Posts

Delve accused of misleading customers with ‘false compliance’

Why Wall Street wasn’t attracted to NVIDIA’s big conference

The mechanism of nuclear fusion power generation and startups pursuing it

FBI warns Russian hackers are targeting Signal, WhatsApp in massive phishing attack

Trending Posts

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading

Welcome to Fyself News, your go-to platform for the latest in tech, startups, inventions, sustainability, and fintech! We are a passionate team of enthusiasts committed to bringing you timely, insightful, and accurate information on the most pressing developments across these industries. Whether you’re an entrepreneur, investor, or just someone curious about the future of technology and innovation, Fyself News has something for you.

Castilla-La Mancha Ignites Innovation: fiveclmsummit Redefines Tech Future

Local Power, Health Innovation: Alcolea de Calatrava Boosts FiveCLM PoC with Community Engagement

The Future of Digital Twins in Healthcare: From Virtual Replicas to Personalized Medical Models

Human Digital Twins: The Next Tech Frontier Set to Transform Healthcare and Beyond

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • User-Submitted Posts
© 2026 news.fyself. Designed by by fyself.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.