tTalk to the people working there, with the feeling that the first week of Odonald Trump went to the federal government. “I have been in the government for more than 10 years and have lived through the first Trump administration, but nothing is comparable,” says the Ministry of Finance. Some workers are busy scrubbing personal social media for items that can be interpreted as dishonesty. Others are rubbing their resumes and anticipate they are looking for a new job right away. People who are planning to stay, because their colleagues do not escape or change, hopes that their job will worsen. Another senior civil servant says that everyone is “absolute panic mode”.
As a candidate, Trump promised to “crush deep state.” Since taking office, it has become clearer what he means. In the barrage of the presidential order, Trump claimed that he could do whatever he likes in the federal government. He argues that he has the “only exclusive authority” to perform “the only exclusive authority” including employment, dismissal, and all spending decisions. In fact, Mr. Trump claims that he is not just a president but an action method enacted by Congress. He claims to be close to the king, and he can refrain from spending or redirect him as he thinks appropriate.
On January 27, Trump revealed how much he intends to push. He will be suspended the next day, even if the parliament approved all the subsidies and loans (social security, med care, and other vaguely defined categories, and spending. The George Town Law School Erose Pasakov stated that the role of the parliament was “drastic and vast”. In the evening, the Judge of the Federation temporarily canceled the memo. It is unknown whether it will happen.
Meanwhile, Trump gained foreign power, almost ambitious, for the federal bureaucracy system, that is, more than 2 million civil servants who actually implement federal policies. He directly fired dozens of senior staff, including other people who have identified him and his appointment as hostile to his goals, such as senior immigrants, prosecutors of the Ministry of Justice. These include 12 or more inspectors (watchdogs that investigate the efficiency and fraudulence of the department). In the case of an inspector, the President is obliged to be notified for 30 days and a clear reason for justifying dismissal. He did neither.
These decisions have been exempted by most departments (as well as the employment related to the healthcare of military, immigration, social security and veterans, and in addition to the hires related to healthcare. In addition, his administration can re -specify the job of a career civil servant as a political job, which allows him to delete all the people he wants. He has also promised to end all of the “diversity, fairness,” work known as the government. I banned my work from my home.
This purpose is to bring Federal workers who do not like Trump to leave. On January 28, an email was sent from the Human Resources Management Bureau (OPM), which provides “resignation” to all the federal government employees. Basically, the conditions are as follows. I agree to leave this fiscal year and work from home. By February 6, the touch, including the instructions to reply with the word “resignation”, was influenced by Mr. Trump’s “government efficiency” or DOGE’s billionaire, Elon Musk. 。 OPM is not a corporate HR category, so this offer rarely endures scrutiny. Federal technology employees have reported that many seemingly late employees of Musk’s company have taken over the government’s IT system and have come to the office to perform “code reviews.”
Mr. Trump has been sticking to these changes -suspicious customers, “Probably the most basic change in the civil servant system since 1883,” said Don Moinihan, a Ford’s Ford’s Faded Policy at the University of Michigan. “(I love many of the Judgment White House). The president seems to be very interested in the belief that most government officials should be the non -party expert that is being deployed to maintain the public in other benefits. Under Trump’s plan, the decision on employment and dismissal is made by his political appointment.
According to Max Stier, a partnership of public service, a charity that helps the government improvement, Trump has “split public servants” to reproduce the “rotting system” of the government until the end of the 19th century. 。 It was a model where the new president came and quickly distributed their work to their colleagues as a reward for supporting their election campaigns.
Will he succeed? Rally Jacobs of Minnesota University says. “Mr. Trump’s order is that they are impressive and breathtaking in their institutional pride,” he says, but he says that Trump is trying to do it. Many argue that it will probably be restored by court or parliament. He pointed out that the Supreme Court often rejected him even after Trump appointed a sympathetic new member in his first semester. Congress has given a lot of power to the presidential position, but managing the federal wallet is a privilege, and it is unlikely that he will succumb.
However, it can take years for the challenge to pass through the court. The damage given in the meantime is considerable. Employees who find another job after being pushed out do not always return just because the court is wrong. Talent new recruiters will not participate. And because the government lawyer is involved in the fear of dismissal, all kinds of illegality may be dominated. STIER is worried that public servants cannot say no, such as the Understanding Office and the Ministry of Justice to punish Trump’s enemies.
The result of the best case is not even good. In the last Trump administration, some of the governments reduced and jam -up by hiring frozen (see the chart). Some of these may be inconvenienced: I am grateful for the issue of the Green Card and Citizenship Application for the reduction of the Ministry of State. However, queues have been extended for basic government services such as passport acquisition and tax refund.
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/content-assets/images/20250201_USC514.png)
“Swampy”, which Trump may call it, may feel like many busy people in Washington DC are pushing out paper. Certainly, it is certainly slow, tied to the rules, and cannot be explained. However, a system based on political loyalty rather than the merits is ready for failure. Bureaucrats make sure that food is not toxic. The car does not explode even if it collides. And the toxic waste is not discarded in the wilderness. “The federal government is very vulnerable,” said Paul Light, a political scholar at New York University. “I have the risk of becoming a president of” I didn’t give a shit, and many people were killed. ” ■
Source link