At this week’s AI Action Summit in Paris, the US refused to sign a statement summarizing the resolution. But it came on: Vice President JD Vance gave a speech to an audience of senior officials, technical leaders and regulatory authorities. In a conference on fair AI development, particularly the big impact of US companies, Vance drew the way the Trump administration sees things. The United States is dominant. I’m going to stay there. And if it doesn’t get in the way, regulations are caring.
The US is developing its own AI action plan, he said, “It’s an overly preventative regulatory regime, ensuring that all Americans benefit from technology and their potential for transformation. “We are avoiding this.” Ignoring current references to EU regulations, Vance worked with the US to invite other countries and expanded its “follow that model if it makes sense to your country.”
This speech highlighted a wider change that was centered around the ideas of AI risk that previously dominated the conversation. “I’m not here this morning to talk about AI safety. This was the title of a meeting a few years ago,” Vance said. “I’m here to talk about AI opportunities.” His message: The US wants to be number one, and regulations are murderers.
Encouraging rooms to mitigate risk, Vance outlined four areas and said the US would focus its commitments.
First, the government ensures that US AI technology will continue to be “gold standards around the world” and that it is a “partner of the choice of others” between the government and business when building services.
But secondly… if regulations are excessive, it could “kill” AI. He said deregulation and “pro-foreign” AI policies are the path forward.
Third, Vance took advantage of the question of using bias and AI to manipulate information. “American AI will not be adopted as a tool for authoritarian censorship,” he pointed out.
Finally, he addressed the issues of labor and how AI would affect it. “The Trump administration will maintain the growth pathway for AI professional workers. Therefore, it could be a powerful tool for job creation in the United States.”
Vance also used his speech to condemn the concept of safety in AI in all guises. At one moment he implied that focusing on it was at the expense of trying to encourage more industrialization.
“The future of AI will not win by wrapping hands around safety,” he said. “It is acquired by building from a reliable power plant in a manufacturing facility where chips of the future can be produced.”
He later returned to AI security, meaning he confused it that it was being promoted for opportunistic and political reasons.
“When a large incumbent asks us for safety regulations, we should ask whether those safety regulations are for our people’s interests or for the incumbent.” he said. “We have now seen governments, businesses and nonprofits not being highly popular over the past few years.
Vance returned some of this towards the end of his speech, but only a little. “This is, of course, not that all safety concerns are coming out the window, and that focus is important. And we’re now catching lightning bolts in bottles, and our most amazing innovators. “We must focus on opportunities to unleash our country and use AI to improve the well-being of our nation and its people,” he said.
Ironically, Vance, focusing on lighter regulations, wasn’t that different from the message from European officials at the summit.
“AI needs people’s confidence and must be safe. And in fact, this is the purpose of the AI law, to provide one safe rule for 450 million European Union. “EU President Ursula von der Leyen said in a speech Tuesday. “Instead of 27 different national regulations and safety for business, at the same time, we know that it has to be made easy.
The useful thing about high-level speech is that you don’t have to face how to implement ideas in the real world and what happens when those ideas contradict each other in complex scenarios. This may be the case here too.
Vance did not elaborate on how AI tools from other countries are handled by the US. Also, dozens of tech companies cited it as reasons for the downsized workforce as a result of AI already impacting labor.
He also did not analyse how the kind of regulations he supported, or “a level playing field,” unfolds for smaller outfits and large tech companies. If there are rules created to encourage small businesses to develop and prosper, it can be at odds with the agenda of large businesses.
The meeting continues today.
Check out the full coverage of the Artificial Intelligence Action Summit in Paris.
Source link
