Seoul, South Korea – The catchphrase “8-0” was blown up with speakers and seen on placards in Seoul’s historic centre.
Protesters on Thursday are confident that Yoon will decide that all eight representative judges of the country’s constitutional court will maintain the motion for each ammo passed in the parliament in mid-December after Yoon’s short-lived martial law bid.
One of two things happens when the final verdict is announced on Friday. Yoon is found guilty and takes office, and the country will hold the SNAP presidential election within 60 days. Or Yoon will be cleared and you will be back to the office immediately.
Located between an ancient palace and a state-of-the-art museum, with a courthouse and translated into “Peaceful Country,” Angak’s neighbourhood is bolstered by hundreds of police buses.
If the disability occurs following the court’s ruling, more than 14,000 police officers have been mobilized in the city while Angak Metro station, local businesses and several schools are closed.

In front of Gyeongbokgung Palace, the student organization staged what sounded like a performance of a celebratory band, in anticipation of the successful bluff each, where many hopes would end a four-month standoff for Yun’s future.
“I totally believe that they will make the right decision,” said Song Hae-joon, who had seen the band from afar on Thursday.
“But I still have only a small portion of the uncertainty, as there’s so much that’s happened over the last few months.”
Since Yoon took office in December, there have been two representative presidents, but Prime Minister Han Duck-Soo, who was next in line with the president, was also fired each by the Parliament.
Han was resurrected as acting president last month, but the court placed a record 38-day record for a court to rule over Yoon.
“By looking at how long it took the court to make a decision, there could have been one or two votes against it. So it may not go from a perfect eight to zero,” Lim Woon Taek, a professor of sociology at Kyimyoung University and a former presidential committee member on policy planning, told Al Jazeera.
“The key point of this fiasco was that the whole country could see what was happening in martial law at night was declared through live feeds on television and its mobile phones. It was clear that the president had stepped over the limits of his power.”
Yoon’s lawsuit centers on whether he broke the law by engaging in five important actions. They allegedly declared martial law, wrote martial law, deployed military forces in the Diet, attacked the National Election Commission, and tried to arrest politicians.
“None of the five reasons are light. The action on December 3rd can be seen as an attempt to suspend the constitutional government, freeze all political activities, and replace the Parliament with alternative forces.”
As a graduate student at Seoul National University, Lim Hyun-chan denounced the long-term decision that the Constitutional Court was too sensitive to public opinion.
“We definitely felt tired from all the waits as we had already protested for four months for many students. But we hope that with the start of the spring and the new semester, this social disruption will eventually return to normal,” he said.
Thousands of protests garnered Thursday night, but Pro One’s supporters were hard to find.
In a small group of less than 10 people, Grace Kim read a poster called “No blast each.”
“I am totally certain that the court will decide to take Yun into office. The entire process of suspending and blasting each president was illegal from the start,” the 63-year-old said.
“If the court decides otherwise, we exercise our right to resistance and fight until the truth wins,” she said.
The prince’s camp was fascinated by the possibility that Democratic leader Lee Jae-myeon would likely become a favorite to win a potential presidential election if Yoon were to be fired each and took office.
For people like Kim Kyung Ha-ion, this is the worst nightmare.
“This should be prevented at any cost. Communist forces permeate our society,” he argued. “Using illegal means to suspend the president and any means necessary to steal authority is something we should be wary of,” he said.
Source link