In 1979, former President Jimmy Carter supervised the founding of modern US Ministry of Education. This is the result of the Biden administration as a characteristic of Carter’s heritage after his death.
Almost half a century later, the 39th president is in the state of the US Council in the State, and the future of the institution may be more threatened than any of history. President Donald Trump, who will be appointed on January 20, has repeatedly promised to “close” a division comparable to “enlarged radical bureaucracy.”
The parallel deserves how the department has become and how it has changed in the five -year history. The next president does not provide details on how to convene the support of legislative agencies to close the federal agencies, but now that the Republican members are managing both of the two councils. Is more likely to be realized. In November, South Dakota’s Republican Senator Micround introduced a bill to dismantle the department and shuffled the office mainly in other cabinet institutions (this plan is a project 2025, conservative policy blue. Similar to what is outlined in the photo).
In some respects, Trump’s criticism of the Ministry of Education reflects what the opposition members have expressed in their establishment. Education is mainly under the dominance of the United States and regions, but conservatives have also opposed the involvement of a few federal governments in schools over the years.
In other methods, Trump’s idea on educational reform requires a bigger federal government in school, not a small one. The tension helps to explain the reasons for the punching bags in the conservative department and as a tool, which is still around.
Read more: A new era of university monitoring is underway at Washington’s Republican ECTA.
Kevin Werner, a professor at the University of Colorado University Border University, said that today’s debate on the future of government agencies has a past response.
“The history is not repeated, but it is rhyme,” he said. “I’m watching the rhyme here.”
Promise of Carter campaign
In the post -death statement of Carter on December 29, Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona said that all his agencies would go back to Carter.
“In the White House, President Carter organizes important federal education programs under a single roof when the Ministry of Education has been established, belonging to the Presidential Cabinet level, which belongs to the Presidential Cabinet level. There is Cardona, “said Cardona.
At the stage preparation stage of Georgia Governor’s Presidential Election in 1976, Carter repeatedly stated his support to establish a federal agency to supervise education. This idea has long existed, but the federal policy related to the university and the K-12 school was under the umbrella of a wider institution, the umbrella, education, and the Ministry of Welfare.
The establishment of an independent educational institution was the goal of the National Education Association, the largest teacher in Japan (powerful units of Washington DC). In September 1976, the profit organization approved Carter. Carter was first approved in the presidential election.
Carter was appointed in January 1977, but it took years to realize his vision.
“I have discovered that, like other presidents, he has discovered that his plan must respond to many other actors,” said QUARTERLY’s academic articles in 1983.
Make Washington Make Make: Sign up to USA Today’s on Politics Newsletter and perform the latest information and expert analysis.
Carter goes to Congress
In February 1978, President Carter delivered a pitch to Congress managed by the Democratic Party.
“The independent Cabinet -level will enable the federal government to become a true partner with states, regions, and private educational institutions to maintain and improve the quality of our educational systems.” I wrote it in a message to the parliament.
Diana Michael, an associate professor at the South Florida University and a book about Jimmy Carter’s educational record, has started pushing in front of him, including Senator Abraham Libikov, a Democratic member of Connecticut. The people started pushing in front of him.
Libikov has seen the fusion of institutions directly as a former secretary of the Ministry of Health, Education and Welfare. With that experience, he became an enthusiastic supporter in the independent education department.
Despite having a powerful ally, such as Ribicoff, Carter’s plan was faced internally and outside. Some officials of his administration did not want to give their power to another institution. And many external profit organizations did not want to change the current situation.
“We prefer the devil we know more than we don’t know,” he argued.
To create a new federal agency, you need parliamentary actions. For Carter, it was relatively easy to whip support in the U.S. Senate. But the lower house was like a headache.
“Representative of the House of Representatives is more likely to respond to the elections every two years, closer to the anti -federal control of the grass roots, and they are likely to respond to it,” said David Stevens, a bureaucrat in Australia. , I wrote in a quarterly article of political science. “But they were also close to the professional vivist in the department that worked hard to get a few votes that might mean victory.”
1979: Created by the education department
After two years of convincing, the Senate passed the Organizing Law on the Organization Law on September 24, 1979 and supported 69 votes. A few days later, the house passed with 215 votes. Carter signed the bill on October 17.
“I don’t know what history shows,” he said at the ceremony that day. education. “”
The reconstructed education department, which started business in 1980, cannot control what schools and universities have taught, but has recently played a major role in regulation. It has the power to fine -ranking schools that cannot protect students and staff from discrimination. Also, if a university wants to participate in the Federal Student Assistance Program, the rules will be written by the university.
In 1965, there was a budget of more than 2,000 employees and $ 1.5 billion before the Education Bureau was spun into its own institutions. By mid -2010, the department had a budget of about $ 60 billion with nearly 4,300 staff members. His responsibilities are enormous, from low -income students to support university payments to managing nearly $ 2 trillion student loan portfolios, comparable to the largest bank assets.
From Reagan to Trump, the agency faces the threat
In the past few decades, all presidents, including Trump, have been promoting educational policy agendas, which are often returned or rewritten when new presidents have grasped power.
Many Washington insiders do not predict that the division of the department will survive the slim majority of the GOP in the Capitol Hill, but the Trump administration is willing to reduce its function and reduce resources. 。 Vivek Ramasuwamy, a former Republican presidential candidate, appointed to lead the new “government efficiency” with the billionaire, the billionaire, has been considered a wasteful expenditure from the federal government. I promised to wipe out. That includes the education department.
“Our educational department will blow off $ $ without explanation,” Ramaswamy wrote in the X post in November. “It is a nucleus problem for bureaucrats that have not been selected.”
After Carter lost his re -election with former President Ronald Reagan in 1980, the successor to the Republican Party, like President Joe Biden, promised that he would close the agency. He never never.
Zachary Schermele is an educational reporter for USA toDay. You can contact him zschermele@usatoday.com by email. Follow him with X of @zachschermele.
Source link
