Washington (AP) – supreme court On Friday, a Trump administration plea granted a plea to cut hundreds of millions of dollars Teacher training money As part of an anti-DEI effort, the lawsuit will continue.
The judge split the 5-4, and joined the three liberal judges with Chief John Roberts challenged.
The cuts on more than 100 programs were temporarily blocked by federal judges in Boston. It turns out that Boston is already affecting training programs aimed at addressing teacher shortages across the country. The federal court of appeals in Boston has ousted appeals from the administration to allow them to resume.
US President Donald Trump holds the signed executive order as he posted a copy of the executive order he signed at a educational event in Washington on March 20, 2025.
Emergency appeal Among some, the High Court considers that the Justice Department alleges that a judge in the lower court improperly obstructed President Donald Trump’s agenda.
Friday’s order was the first time in three attempts that the country’s highest courts gave the administration what they wanted based on the emergency.
US District Judge Myung Jawoon has issued temporary restraining orders sought by eight Democratic-led states that claim efforts from the Trump administration are likely to drive cuts. Eliminate diversity, equity and comprehensive programs.
The Republican president has also signed an executive order calling for the dismantling of the Education Departmentand his administration has already begun overhauling many of its work, including cutting dozens of contracts that have been dismissed as “awakening” and useless.
The U.S. Department of Education will be seen in Washington on Tuesday, December 3, 2024.
The two programs in question (Teacher Quality Partnership and Supporting Effective Educator Development) provide over $600 million grants to teacher preparation programs, often in subject areas such as mathematics, science and special education. They said the data showed that the programmes have led to increased teacher retention, ensuring that educators remain in the profession for more than five years.
Despite Joun discovering that the program is already affected, the conservative majority of the High Court writes that the state can continue to run the program with its own money for now. In contrast, the majority said they were unsigned opinions, saying that if the federal government ultimately wins the lawsuit, they would likely not be able to recover cash.
On Thursday, March 20, 2025, dozens of people gathered in downtown Niles, Michigan, protesting the Department of Education’s recent government cuts. (The Herald Palladium via Don Campbell/ap)
Judge Elena Kagan wrote in dissent that there is no reason for the court’s emergency intervention.
“The government will not defend this here the legality of canceling problematic education grants,” Kagan wrote.
In another opinion, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote, “It’s not inexplicable to think that a large portion of government applications are emergency.”
The administration suspended the program in February without prior notice. Joun, the Democrat’s appointee of President Joe Biden, discovered that the cancellation violates federal law, which probably requires clear explanations.
The appeal panel, which rejected the administration’s request for stay, consisted of judges appointed by Democrats.
California is led ongoing lawsuits, with participation from Massachusetts, New Jersey, Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, New York and Wisconsin.
Boston public schools have already had to fire a few full-time employees due to the loss of Grant’s funds, and the University of New Jersey has also cancelled the remaining programs of teachers and resistance. California State University has ended its support for 20 students in a similar program and eliminated financial support for 50 students.
___
Source link
