Palantir posts mini-manifesto denouncing inclusivity and ‘regressive’ culture

Monitoring and analytics company Palantir recently posted what it calls a 22-part “brief” summary of CEO Alex Karp’s book, The Technological Republic.

“Technology Republic,” written by Karp and Palantir Executive Director Nicholas Zamiska, was published last year and the authors described it as “the beginning of clarifying the theory” behind Palantir’s work. (One reviewer said it was “not a book, but part of a company’s sales materials.”)

Since then, the company’s ideological leanings have come under increased scrutiny as tech industry insiders debate Palantir’s work with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the company positions itself as an organization working in defense of “the West.”

In fact, Congressional Democrats recently sent a letter to ICE and the Department of Homeland Security requesting more information about how tools built by Palantir and “various surveillance companies” are being used in the Trump administration’s aggressive deportation strategy.

Palantir’s post does not directly address that context, saying it is simply providing an overview “because we are often asked about it.” It suggests that “Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the countries that made its rise possible” and declares that “free email is not enough.”

“The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed of its ruling class, can only be tolerated if that culture can bring economic growth and security to its people,” the company said.

The posts were far-reaching, at one point criticizing a culture that was “almost mocking”. [Elon] “Musk is interested in grand narratives,” he said, at another point touching on the recent debate over the military’s use of artificial intelligence.

“The question is not whether AI weapons will be produced, but who will produce them and for what purpose,” Palantir said. “Our adversaries are not going to indulge in theatrics about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will move forward.”

Similarly, the company suggests that while “the nuclear era is ending,” “a new era of AI-based deterrence is beginning.”

The post also denounced the “postwar emasculation of Germany and Japan” in passing, saying that “Germany’s condemnation is an overreaching revision for which Europe is now paying a heavy price” and adding that “a similarly highly theatrical commitment to Japan’s pacifism” “threatens to change the balance of power in Asia.”

The post ends by criticizing the “shallow seduction of empty and empty pluralism.” Palantir’s argument is that blind devotion to pluralism and inclusivity “ignores the fact that certain cultures, and indeed subcultures… have produced wonders. Other cultures have proven half-hearted, or worse, regressive and harmful.”

After Palantir posted this on Saturday, Elliott Higgins, CEO of the research website Bellingcat, said dryly: “It’s very normal for companies to make this public. There’s nothing wrong with it.”

Higgins also argued that the post was about more than a simple “defense of the West.” In his view, this was an attack on verification, deliberation and accountability, which are key pillars of democracy that need to be rebuilt.

“It is also important to be clear who is making the argument,” Higgins wrote. “Palantir sells operational software to defense, intelligence, immigration, and law enforcement agencies. These 22 items are not a philosophy floating in space, but the public ideology of a company dependent on the politics of profit.”