The new court submitted in a famous lawsuit indicates how much feet the donor children have in the university entrance process.
The most selectively selective universities and internal records in Japan describe a picture of a system full of loose criteria with the applicant with wealthy parents.
The evidence submitted on Monday is a legal battle over the claim that 17 out of the national top schools violated the anti -Trust method by collusion to reduce the fiscal assistance of less wealthy students over the years. Shows a new stage. The student group first sued the school in 2022. Their lawyers have now claimed that they and their friends have overwhelmed over $ 685 million over $ 685 million on suspicion of conspiracy. School lawyers call these calculations “junk science”.
After a prolonged court, 10 schools, including Yale University and Brown University, settled with students for $ 284 million in July. Other universities named in a lawsuit continue to fight court accusations. All 17 institutions have been denied fraud.
This lawsuit makes new questions about the fairness of university enrollment, and a large number of celebrities and business big guys have been involved in large -scale scam plans, covering their prestigious universities. The comparison with the Operation Bar City Blues scandal involved in the scandal. Since last summer’s village, a similar price fixed lawsuit has appeared on some of the same top schools.
Students and their parents involved in universities have long been criticized for the selective private university enrollment process, saying they are opaque and unfair. Many of these schools have acknowledged that they gave some priority treatment to some of the children of the donors to benefit the entire student, but the evidence submitted to the court on Monday is controversial. We provide a unique glimpse of what the taste actually looks like.
There are five outstanding accusations.
Following # 1: George Town had a “President’s List”
The record of the school submitted in the court is a “special -interested admission policy” that the University of George Town in Washington DC provides “treatments that are liked at the time of admission” to students who can support the improvement of funding. It indicates that it has followed.
A plaintiff’s lawyer says that the university has complied this policy by creating a “list of president” for about 80 wealthy applicants. The student in the list says that he has almost always recognized, and the word “Please admit” has been added to the “President’s List” application.
The university spokesman refused to comment on Tuesday, but the school lawyer has strongly opposed the lawsuit.
Attorneys # 2: The Notre Dam administrator acknowledged the donor preference
In the e -mail written in 2012, the Vice President of the Faculty of Notre Dame University had influenced some of the “high gifts” or “potential gifts” of the student’s family at the time. I acknowledged it.
In particular, the Indiana University officials complained that in 2012, children with donors had entered in 2012, despite their poor academic achievements.
“I hope that the wealthy people will raise a slightly wise child next year!”
In a statement on Tuesday, the university stated that there was no merit in the plaintiff’s claim. The school said that all students recognized by Notre Dame were completely qualified and ready to succeed.
Following # 3: Former pen enrollment Dean will broadcast frustration
According to a Monday court application, the University of Pennsylvania, the Filadelphia Ivy League school, gave donors priority treatment.
A former director of school, who worked at school from 1999 to 2008, testified that some applicants have been designated as “genuine special interest” or BSI. The students marked with the “BSI tag” were parents, who were “big donors” or members of the council assertion.
“You can’t get it to get a BSI tag,” she said. “You would have been gained in almost 100 % time.”
In a statement on Tuesday, David Gringer, a pen spokesman, did not support the student who donated or sworn by the family. He said he was revealed.
“In fact, universities are taking great precautionary measures to prevent such preferences from being given,” said Gringer. “As a result, only certified candidates are accepted.”
Attorneys # 4: Cornell conducted a “connection review” of the applicant.
According to plaintiffs’ lawyers, Cornell University, a school in the Ivy League in New York, has a record of tracking applicants who have been “supported by donors of real institutions.”
According to Monday applications, the enrollment team often conducted a “connection review” for students on the “VIP watchlist” by the school’s funding team.
Cornell’s spokesman refused to comment on Tuesday.
Attorneys # 5: MIT Committee’s chairs were under pressure
Furthermore, the submission accuses the chairman of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to put pressure on the faculty of his former colleagues to be one of his former colleagues.
Kimberly Allen, a MIT spokesman, said in a statement that the lawsuit had no evidence, and the school had no history of wealth.
Allen said that there was a long -standing lawsuit that “millions of documents provided an overwhelming record in our admission process were created.”
Despite the pile of evidence, she said, “The plaintiff can quote a single case that helped the members of the Board of Directors to shake the decisions of the two undergraduate applicants.”
“Contrary to what the plaintiff’s claim, the possibility of charity was unrelated to these isolated cases, and in fact, our records are disappointed by wealthy individual children on a daily basis. She reflects receiving the news. “
Allen said that the school is planning to submit an answer to the application on Monday next month.
Zachary Schermele is an educational reporter for USA toDay. You can contact him zschermele@usatoday.com by email. Follow him with X of @zachschermele.
Source link
