NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Tennessee public schools may be needed immediately to teach that keys to successful life include following the right events, such as high school, work or higher education, marriage, and children.
This is a proposal to move forward within the state’s Republican-dominated Congress, similar to other legislatures that are moving in several states this year.
In Tennessee, the Senate passed 25-5 on Thursday. There are a few steps left at the house.
“Some children don’t have the privilege of recognizing it or living in it,” said Sen. Janice Bowling of Tarahoma, who sponsors the bill. “And in these classes these kids are given the key to success.”
Republican supporters argued that so-called success sequences can help people free themselves from poverty by delaying life events, such as getting married before giving birth to children. Democrat opponents raised concerns that instructions could instruct students about being a personal choice for students, and that students with single parents could feel bad about themselves.
Republicans have submitted similar proposals in other states, including Texas, Kentucky, Mississippi and Ohio, according to an Associated Press analysis. Invoice Tracking Software Plural. In Utah, the governor has already signed the bill.
Several advocacy groups are pushing for policy changes, including the American Enterprise Institute and the Heritage Foundation.
The Tennessee proposal requires that the family life curriculum for public K-12 schools includes age-appropriate education regarding the “positive personal and social outcomes” of the sequence. State law allows parents to oust families from the planning curriculum.
Senator London Lamar is a Memphis Democrat, mother of one, 34, and daughter of a single mother. She said she knows many people born into two parents’ households that are far beyond life.
“This bill is misguided and extremely offensive and proves that it has no merit,” Lamar said.
Republican supporters of the bill say that sequences are a goal supported by research, but that is not absolute for everyone’s life situations. Critics of the sequence say they rely on correlations without sufficient evidence of causality to oversimplify the various factors that drive people into poverty.
Source link
