PHOENIX (AP) — Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs has rejected a proposal that prohibits teaching reactivism to educators who violate the state’s public K-12 state, from public K-12, college, college and new rules.
The proposal would prohibit teachers and administrators from teaching or promoting anti-Semitic or anti-Semitic behavior that creates an adversarial environment, seeking genocide from any group, or requiring students to defend anti-Semitic perspectives. They would have also forbidden public schools from using public funds to support anti-Semitism teaching.
The educator would have personally been responsible for covering the costs of compensation for the lawsuit for breaching the rules.
Democrat Hobbs said Tuesday that the bill was not anti-Semitism, but attacking teachers.
“We will implement unacceptable levels of personal liability for educators and staff at public schools, community colleges and universities, and spread them to the threat of personal and costly litigation,” she said in a statement. “In addition, it sets a dangerous precedent that unfairly targets public school teachers while protecting private school staff.”
Hobbs described anti-Semitism as a very troublesome issue in the United States, but said students and parents could pass the state’s board of education to report anti-Semitism.
The measure cleared Congress last week with a 33-20 vote by the House of Representatives. This includes several Democrats who supported it across the party’s boundaries. This is one of several suggestions to combat anti-Semitism across the country.
Democrats failed to remove the legal guided references to anti-Semitism along with “illegal discrimination” to reflect other discrimination, and did not remove the lawsuit’s provisions.
Republican Rep. Michael Way of Queen Creek, the bill’s chief sponsor, said his proposal would create accountability if educators cannot protect students from students. The rise of anti-Semitism Since the start of the Israeli-Hamas War.
Opponents said the bill was intended to silence those who wanted to speak out about Palestinian oppression and open educators to personal legal liability for lawsuits that students can file.
The parents of students over the age of 18 and young students were able to file lawsuits for violations that create hostile educational environments, held liability for paying damages that could be awarded, denying immunity and prohibiting the state from paying judgments arising out of such cases.
Last week, Lori Shepherd, executive director of the Tucson Jewish Museum & Holocaust Center, wrote to Hobbs that if the bill is approved it would threaten its ability to provide teacher students with a full Holocaust account.
Under the bill, “these arguments could be considered “anti-Semitism” depending on how a single phrase is interpreted, regardless of intention or context,” she said.
The bill would have created a process to punish those who break the rules. In K-12 schools, initial attack violations lead to responsibilities, a second offence for suspension of a teacher or principal’s certificate, and a third offence for revoking the certificate.
In the university, the offender would have faced a suspension on the first crime, no payment for the second violation, and the termination of the third violation. The proposal would also require universities and universities to view employee violations as a negative factor when making employment or tenure decisions.
Under the proposal, the universities and universities were unable to recognize student organizations that incite anti-Semitism and invite guest speakers to encourage members to engage in anti-Semitism.
Elsewhere in the US, Louisiana lawmakers are pushing for a resolution calling on universities to fight anti-Semitism on campus and to adopt policies to collect data on anti-Semitism-related reports and complaints. And Michigan lawmakers proposed putting the definition of anti-Semitism into state civil rights laws.
Source link
